I've got no idea who either party is in this matter, but I'd be very, very surprised if a Mother & Father have randomly approached the BBC with a totally false allegation regarding their son & one of their employees, supposedly produced evidence to support the claim, waited 2 months for a response and then gone to The Sun with the story and evidence (and not asked for payment), and then The Sun have printed it without doing any due diligence whatsoever. They'd want something, no matter how small, that was 100% factual to hang the rest of the story on.
